2 Aug
2011
2 Aug
'11
4:52 p.m.
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Tom Gundersen
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:38 PM, C Anthony Risinger
wrote: ... out of curiosity, if the original reason for having a `kernel26` package was to also have a `kernel24` (from what i read -- wasn't around then) how is this handled with the `linux` package? or is this a non-issue?
We no longer support linux 2.4... How would this be an issue?
sorry i wasn't clear -- i meant when the time comes that dual support would be desirable, eg. linux 4.7 or whatever :-) C Anthony