-----Original Message-----
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:09:44 +0100 Subject: Re: [arch-general] Moonlight 1.0 From: Amanai <amanai@freenet.de> To: "General Discusson about Arch Linux" <arch-general@archlinux.org>
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:39:40 -0800, stefan-husmann@t-online.de <stefan-husmann@t-online.de> wrote:
Hello,
I agree perfectly. But it would be the correct way to handle things like that, and would put some noise away from this list.
BTW, the new rules for the TUs would even forbid to put it to community without discussion. The devs might have some similar rules for putting something new to extra.
Regards Stefan
New rules? The voting never worked and will never working!
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:18:59 -0800, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
Agreed. We're not in the habit of adding packages to extra simply because of one noisy user. We need to ensure people will actually use it so we're not wasting our time.
It was just one question if "moonlight" will pe a part of Archlinux and you call me "noisy user"! You must be a typical american overweight kid to say this! Did I wake you up in your dreamworld?
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 07:14:49 -0800, Vesa Kaihlavirta <vpkaihla@gmail.com> wrote:
I gotta say, even with all the usual MS distrust that I've been carrying around since MS-DOS 3.x, on the surface Moonlight looks much more promising than the clusterfsck that is Flash. I'd be interested in at least giving it a shot.
--vk
This sounds mutch better,
They may work or not, rules are rules.