On 28/09/12 19:01, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
The 27/09/12, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
Can you give some examples of discussions you would see moving to archlinux-dev?
Sure.
Subject: [arch-general] Modifying archiso From: Robbie Smith
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:47:11 +1000 To: arch-general@archlinux.org Message-ID: <5058431F.5090707@gmail.com> Subject: [arch-general] Open Build Service adds support for Arch Linux From: André Prata
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:48:36 +0100 To: arch-general@archlinux.org Subject: [arch-general] swt - why depends bump to java-runtime>=7? From: "David C. Rankin"
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:06:46 -0500 To: Archlinux Message-ID: <504E5666.3000902@suddenlinkmail.com> Subject: [arch-general] archiso - more install guides From: vadim kochan
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 22:33:39 +0300 To: arch-general@archlinux.org Subject: [arch-general] Requesting ownership of the bugs for AIF in the bugtracker From: Jeremiah Dodds
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 05:21:24 -0400 To: Arch General List Message-ID: <87ehmjxy0b.fsf@friendface.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Subject: [arch-dev-public] Re: [RFC] another base cleanup From: Nicolas Sebrecht
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 09:27:58 +0200 To: Public mailing list for Arch Linux development Message-ID: <20120607072758.GB2427@nicolas-desktop> These are only samples. I can't take the samples of topic not even written
If all that crap went to arch-dev-public, I would have to unsubscribe there too. Allan