7 Apr
2011
7 Apr
'11
3:34 a.m.
Am Wed, 06 Apr 2011 22:24:45 -0500
schrieb "David C. Rankin"
Upstream stability makes sense. If redhat is behind cronie, then that seems like the logical choice.
Why is this logical? Is it the developer what makes a software good or is it the features and the stability? If Redhat's cronie has less features than fcron then fcron is the logical choice, of course.
Otherwise, we are bound to repeat this discussion 12 months from now when fcron or dcron has problems that are not being fixed.
dcron has a lot of issues, while fcron works since years. There's no need to wait again 12 months. This discussion already takes more than a year. Heiko