8 Apr
2011
8 Apr
'11
11:42 a.m.
On 08/04/11 07:16, Heiko Baums wrote:
But let's try to get objective again.
No need. A new cron for [core] has to pass only one condition... :) 1) a developer is willing to maintain it. So far that seems to be Thomas and fcron. Anyway, I recall mention in our bug report of a patch being submitted upstream that fixed the dcron timing issue. Would this be "solved" - at least in the short term - if we got a copy of that patch and fixed dcron? Allan