On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Myra Nelson
While working on some AUR packages, I took a look at the PKGBUILD prototypes that come with pacman. The one difference that I had a question about has to do with this snippet:
_author=AUTHOR_NAME
_perlmod=MODNAME
pkgname=perl-$_perlmod
pkgver=VERSION
Since the MODNAME package being downloaded is, major caveat --usually, BackPAN-Index-0.40.tar.gz that would make the pkgname perl-BackPAN-Index-$pkgver[whatever]. A quick survey of the Arch package database still shows packages still named like perl-backpan-index-$pkgver[whatever]. I've yet to use the pkgname style, but was wondering if this is the future of perl package naming?
Myra -- Life's fun when your sick and psychotic!
I'm simply asking it the PKGBUILD-perl.proto with the
pkgname=perl-$_perlmod is correct.
# This is an example PKGBUILD file. Use this as a start to creating your own,
# and remove these comments. For more information, see 'man PKGBUILD'.
# NOTE: Please fill out the license field for your package! If it is unknown,
# then please put 'unknown'.
# See http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Perl_Package_Guidelines for more
# information on Perl packaging.
# Maintainer: Your Name