On 01/04/2012 05:11 PM, Jonathan Vasquez wrote:
On Jan 4, 2012 6:26 PM, "Peter Lewis"<plewis@aur.archlinux.org> wrote:
On Wednesday 04 Jan 2012 16:16:45 Jonathan Vasquez wrote:
Never said the entire community was a democracy, I did say thought that like a democracy people vote for the packages to be included. You are right, that the Trusted Users have the final say on what packages get included, I never said otherwise. We obviously can't let everyone in the community have read/write access to the community repo, but the packages that the community members voted for in the AUR, are being looked at by the Trusted Users. That's not a problem to me, and if anything is a sign of a Representative Democracy. In the AUR aspect specifically. Hitler was also chosen because of his intelligence and other credentials. How does this relate? Just because a person is elected because of "perceived" credentials that you can obviously prove that they have, does not mean that the person will continue to act in that fashion. Hopefully they will. 24+ messages in a thread which itself is a split from its original. Nice to see that Godwin's Law [1] still applies on "proper" mailing lists in 2012 ;-) Happy new year folks!
Pete.
Lol Pete. I was actually speaking to Ross about this law when he brought it to my attention. I didn't even know it existed and I normally tend to refrain from bringing Hitler into a conversion. Maybe I should have brought a politician that always promises things, but once elected changes his views and attitudes.
Happy new year as well. Nixon ? LOL ;P