Could be I'm missing something here... But shouldn't 'pacman -S eterm'
put executable somewhere in the standard path??? This was done using a
root shell in a konsole terminal under E17 on my recently updated
Arch installation... I did search the wiki for eterm just in case there
was something about eterm that requires more than a simple pacman install.
Didn't find anything useful.
Am I missing something obvious here???
UnderTree =-> pacman -S eterm
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...
Targets (2): libast-0.7-2 eterm-0.9.5-3
Total Download Size: 0.91 MB
Total Installed Size: 2.98 MB
Proceed with installation? [Y/n] y
:: Retrieving packages from community...
libast-0.7-2 260.8K 315.2K/s 00:00:01 [###############################] 100%
eterm-0.9.5-3 674.3K 828.9K/s 00:00:01 [###############################] 100%
checking package integrity...
(2/2) checking for file conflicts [###############################] 100%
(1/2) installing libast [###############################] 100%
(2/2) installing eterm [###############################] 100%
UnderTree =-> eterm
bash: eterm: command not found
UnderTree =->
Here are the last few lines of my pacman.log:
[2010-04-17 00:35] synchronizing package lists
[2010-04-17 00:38] installed roxterm (1.18.1-1)
[2010-04-19 21:31] synchronizing package lists
[2010-04-19 21:34] installed libast (0.7-2)
[2010-04-19 21:34] installed eterm (0.9.5-3)
I note roxterm works, eterm doesn't...
I don't see any errors listed in the pacman.log...
--
| ~^~ ~^~
| <?> <?> Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
| ^ J(tWdy)P
| \___/ <