On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Heiko Baums <lists@baums-on-web.de> wrote:
Am Tue, 25 Sep 2012 09:28:40 -0300 schrieb Denis A. Altoé Falqueto <denisfalqueto@gmail.com>:
How long will we have to endure such nonsense? Heiko, you hijacked a thread just to tell your opinion, which everyone already know from your previous posts. And, please, don't reply to me. I don't care.
Thomas, wasn't he banned? I just thought he was, because he was threat and, yet, was pretty harsh on his later reply. I really don't understand that. Of course, the list managers have all the freedom to do as they please, but a threat that is not upheld is counterproductive.
What about banning you, because of writing totally bullshit which has totally nothing to do with systemd, because of just telling your hate against "systemd haters"? One more who wants to have other people being banned just because he doesn't want to read other people's opinions.
"Hey, I don't like him and his opinion. So admins, ban him." Is it this what you want to say?
Sorry, I really don't want to and won't continue this way, but I just had to answer to this. And, btw., no, I wasn't the one who got personal here. So don't blame me, blame Denis.
People, particularly the systemd fanboys, should really start opening their eyes and taking off their rose-colored glasses.
Have you read this? https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2012-September/031182.h... Specifcaly, this part? "If I see you interrupting one more technical discussion with trolls and flames, you will be banned indefinitely without further notice. I will not see another one week flamewar on this list." Those are no my words, btw. -- A: Because it obfuscates the reading. Q: Why is top posting so bad? For more information, please read: http://idallen.com/topposting.html ------------------------------------------- Denis A. Altoe Falqueto Linux user #524555 -------------------------------------------