On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 22:27:48 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 22:22:14 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
I suspect that paccheck's recursive option is unneeded.
Doing a few tests, the quite option seems to have no impact either.
paccheck --opt-depends
or
paccheck --opt-depends PACKAGE_NAME
seems to provide the same output as
paccheck --opt-depends --quiet --recursive
*?*
In the context without a PACKAGE_NAME ;), but I'm mistaken. The quite option does make a big difference, just the recursive option seems to be unimportant for the purpose. [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ paccheck --opt-depends --quiet --recursive > /tmp/check_1.txt [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ paccheck --opt-depends --recursive> /tmp/check_2.txt [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ diff /tmp/check_1.txt /tmp/check_2.txt 0a1,30
2mandvd: all optional dependencies satisfied [...] [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ paccheck --opt-depends --quiet --recursive > /tmp/check_3.txt [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ paccheck --opt-depends --quiet > /tmp/check_4.txt [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ diff /tmp/check_3.txt /tmp/check_4.txt; echo $? 0