This was rather strange on VirtualBox module rebuild, I received:
==> dkms install --no-depmod vboxhost/6.1.34_non_OSE -k 5.15.51-1-lts /usr/bin/dkms: line 1033: sha512: command not found /usr/bin/dkms: line 1033: sha512: command not found /usr/bin/dkms: line 1033: sha512: command not found ==> dkms install --no-depmod vboxhost/6.1.34_non_OSE -k 5.18.8-arch1-1 /usr/bin/dkms: line 1033: sha512: command not found /usr/bin/dkms: line 1033: sha512: command not found /usr/bin/dkms: line 1033: sha512: command not found
Looks just like:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=277700
Some type regression? What about the symlink discussed in the bbs topic? Necessary?
On Sun, 3 Jul 2022 at 07:34, David C. Rankin via arch-general arch-general@lists.archlinux.org wrote:
This was rather strange on VirtualBox module rebuild, I received:
==> dkms install --no-depmod vboxhost/6.1.34_non_OSE -k 5.15.51-1-lts /usr/bin/dkms: line 1033: sha512: command not found /usr/bin/dkms: line 1033: sha512: command not found /usr/bin/dkms: line 1033: sha512: command not found ==> dkms install --no-depmod vboxhost/6.1.34_non_OSE -k 5.18.8-arch1-1 /usr/bin/dkms: line 1033: sha512: command not found /usr/bin/dkms: line 1033: sha512: command not found /usr/bin/dkms: line 1033: sha512: command not found
Looks just like:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=277700
Some type regression? What about the symlink discussed in the bbs topic? Necessary?
I upgrade this morning and got the same errors. The symlink worked for me. I made a note for myself to remove it some day when this is fixed.
On 03/07/2022 08:53, Piscium via arch-general wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jul 2022 at 07:34, David C. Rankin via arch-general
What about the symlink discussed in the bbs topic?
The symlink worked for me.
As noted in the bug report and the forum thread the symlink hides the error but is not a fix, as "sha512" is an argument being passed to another command rather than a command in itself.
On Mon, 4 Jul 2022 at 12:14, Jonathon Fernyhough via arch-general arch-general@lists.archlinux.org wrote:
On 03/07/2022 08:53, Piscium via arch-general wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jul 2022 at 07:34, David C. Rankin via arch-general
What about the symlink discussed in the bbs topic?
The symlink worked for me.
As noted in the bug report and the forum thread the symlink hides the error but is not a fix, as "sha512" is an argument being passed to another command rather than a command in itself.
True. However with the symlink trick my PC booted fine whereas I am not sure it would have booted fine without any change at all (I use the proprietary nvidia drivers).
In any case, I have removed the symlink, downgraded dkms and kmod, added them to the ignore list in pacman.conf, and reinstalled the kernel and its headers (and the lts version) and all is good.
The reason for downgrading kmod is a warning, which may be harmless but I did not want to take chances. https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/75218
arch-general@lists.archlinux.org