Re: [arch-general] signoff linux-3.1.5-1
All, I haven't seen tpowa's normal kernel signoff, so just dropping a note it's good on multiple x86_64 and i686 boxes here. Only issue this time, which I haven't seen in the past 4-5 kernels, was the x86_64 MSI box that had a problem with the boot image being placed in a location that leaves the box unable to boot with grub. This is just a Russian Roulette issue with this one box. All others server & desktop installs updated fine. -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 8:14 PM, David C. Rankin <drankinatty@suddenlinkmail.com> wrote:
All,
I haven't seen tpowa's normal kernel signoff
Maybe it's because http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2011-November/021972.... ?
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 08:17:24PM +0100, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 8:14 PM, David C. Rankin <drankinatty@suddenlinkmail.com> wrote:
All,
I haven't seen tpowa's normal kernel signoff
Maybe it's because http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2011-November/021972.... ?
Correct. You can still reply to signoff reports if you want to leave a comment.
On 12/16/2011 01:17 PM, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
Maybe it's because http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2011-November/021972.... ?
That was it.. Missed the dev post :( -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 4:47 AM, David C. Rankin <drankinatty@suddenlinkmail.com> wrote:
On 12/16/2011 01:17 PM, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
Maybe it's because http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2011-November/021972.... ?
That was it.. Missed the dev post :(
Don't feel bad, you're not the only one https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=130731 :-P
participants (3)
-
David C. Rankin
-
Karol Blazewicz
-
Lukas Fleischer