Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [RFC] official systemd support
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> wrote:
Hi guys, <snip> 3) packages are compiled with systemd support where it is available and does not cause regressions on non-systemd systems. <snip>
Should bugs be opened against packages where this is not yet the case? I have an old closed as WONTFIX bug on dovecot for example (which I just filed for re-opening).
On Apr 17, 2012 10:41 AM, "Oon-Ee Ng" <ngoonee.talk@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> wrote:
Hi guys, <snip> 3) packages are compiled with systemd support where it is available and does not cause regressions on non-systemd systems. <snip>
Should bugs be opened against packages where this is not yet the case? I have an old closed as WONTFIX bug on dovecot for example (which I just filed for re-opening).
I don't think that is necessary. We are still organizing. At some point we'll likely do a mass migration. Tom
participants (2)
-
Oon-Ee Ng
-
Tom Gundersen