[arch-general] Test - Sorry but good reason for it. Please ignore - Arch-general - lists.archlinux.org

newer
[arch-general] MUA

[arch-general] Test - Sorry but good reason for it. Please ignore

older
[arch-general] pam settings...

Geoff

18 Nov 2009 18 Nov '09

7:53 p.m.

Sorry to post a test message, but I am an infrequent poster whose e-mails have not been getting through. I wrote to the list admins about it a while ago but got no response, so I have unsubscribed / resubscribed.

Show replies by date

Aaron Griffin

18 Nov 18 Nov

7:59 p.m.

New subject: [arch-general] Test - Sorry but good reason for it. Please ignore

On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Geoff wrote:

Sorry to post a test message, but I am an infrequent poster whose e-mails have not been getting through. I wrote to the list admins about it a while ago but got no response, so I have unsubscribed / resubscribed.

Seems to work now :)

Geoff

8:14 p.m.

On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:59:33 -0600 Aaron Griffin wrote:

Seems to work now :)

Actually the last thread I posted to was one where you gave me a ticking-off for prolonging it past your expression of displeasure at its continuance. I wondered if maybe I had been banned. Maybe I was. Maybe I should not have mentioned it ........ ummmmmmmmmm

Aaron Griffin

8:38 p.m.

New subject: [arch-general] Test - Sorry but good reason for it. Please ignore

On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Geoff wrote:

On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:59:33 -0600 Aaron Griffin wrote:

...
Seems to work now :)

Actually the last thread I posted to was one where you gave me a ticking-off for prolonging it past your expression of displeasure at its continuance. I wondered if maybe I had been banned. Maybe I was. Maybe I should not have mentioned it ........ ummmmmmmmmm

Hrm, I doubt it. I've only ever banned one person from the MLs as far as I can remember

Ng Oon-Ee

11:35 p.m.

On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 14:38 -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:

On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Geoff wrote:

...
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:59:33 -0600 Aaron Griffin wrote:

...
Seems to work now :)

Actually the last thread I posted to was one where you gave me a ticking-off for prolonging it past your expression of displeasure at its continuance. I wondered if maybe I had been banned. Maybe I was. Maybe I should not have mentioned it ........ ummmmmmmmmm

Hrm, I doubt it. I've only ever banned one person from the MLs as far as I can remember

You can be banned from the ML? But its publicly available (the archives at least) and there's no limitation on sign-ups....

Aaron Griffin

11:51 p.m.

New subject: [arch-general] Test - Sorry but good reason for it. Please ignore

2009/11/18 Ng Oon-Ee :

On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 14:38 -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:

...
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Geoff wrote:

...
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:59:33 -0600 Aaron Griffin wrote:

...
Seems to work now :)

Actually the last thread I posted to was one where you gave me a ticking-off for prolonging it past your expression of displeasure at its continuance. I wondered if maybe I had been banned. Maybe I was. Maybe I should not have mentioned it ........ ummmmmmmmmm

Hrm, I doubt it. I've only ever banned one person from the MLs as far as I can remember

You can be banned from the ML? But its publicly available (the archives at least) and there's no limitation on sign-ups....

Well yeah, but individual email addresses can be banned. Not too many people on the MLs are juvenile enough to register with 10 other email addresses and spam messages

Ng Oon-Ee

19 Nov 19 Nov

12:33 a.m.

On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 17:51 -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:

2009/11/18 Ng Oon-Ee :

...
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 14:38 -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:

...
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Geoff wrote:

...
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:59:33 -0600 Aaron Griffin wrote:

...
Seems to work now :)

Actually the last thread I posted to was one where you gave me a ticking-off for prolonging it past your expression of displeasure at its continuance. I wondered if maybe I had been banned. Maybe I was. Maybe I should not have mentioned it ........ ummmmmmmmmm

Hrm, I doubt it. I've only ever banned one person from the MLs as far as I can remember

You can be banned from the ML? But its publicly available (the archives at least) and there's no limitation on sign-ups....

Well yeah, but individual email addresses can be banned. Not too many people on the MLs are juvenile enough to register with 10 other email addresses and spam messages

Ah fair enough.

5278

Age (days ago)

5279

Last active (days ago)

Download

6 comments

3 participants

tags

participants (3)

Aaron Griffin
Geoff
Ng Oon-Ee