On 3/16/18, Jelle van der Waa <jelle@vdwaa.nl> wrote:

On 03/15/18 at 09:29pm, Carsten Mattner via arch-general wrote:

...

On 3/15/18, Eli Schwartz via arch-general <arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote:

...

Good news, I guess, is that we will almost certainly switch to bugzilla as soon as Harmony brings stable psgi support (Soon™).

Harmony? PSGI?

I like Bugzilla's features, and I don't use arch's tracker enough to have a voice, or maintain it to have a say, but I would still like to provide an opinion. It's just an opinion. Having used large bugzilla installations like mozilla.org, kernel.org, freedesktop.org, it doesn't look like Bugzilla can be fast. I've found Mantis and to some extend Redmine to be fast and lean trackers. These may or may not suit Arch's needs, and I still have hope Bugzilla will at some point become snappy.

Just an opinion based on experience, the arch admins/devs will know why bugzilla is the right choice. I trust them.

Please don't de-rail the thread. (Obviously the Arch devs also want a performing bugtracker, but Flyspray has to go either way)

Sorry about that. I let my pain of disappointing bugzilla performance speak in the wrong context. Are the Arch devs looking for input on this in some ticket/forum? Like I said, I don't use it enough to care deeply, but I'm happy to provide experience report if needed.