Hello,
First of all, I think the mirror team put a lot of effort in this RFC
and it's great. I would like to suggest one more thing, outside the
gitlab.
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 4:10 AM Polarian
Hello,
I am not a staff member, but I like to read the RFCs and arch news and I have a few things..
Polarian's review was (more or less) reflected to gitlab. So now, I think we can agree (more or less) on the standardization of the mirror tier model, requirements and recommendations, although details like storage requirements can be fine-tuned. What remains to be discussed, possibly even controversial, is some new features that were proposed, namely "validation of ownership", "Status endpoint JSON manifest". Therefore, I suggest splitting this RFC into two RFCs. We can leave new features to the second RFC for more discussions and maybe even trial runs and testing. I hope by splitting the RFC, it can improve our efficiency and not cause the whole RFC to stall. -- Jing Luo About me: https://jing.rocks/about/ PGP Fingerprint: 4E09 8D19 00AA 3F72 1899 2614 09B3 316E 13A1 1EFC