- Arch-ports - lists.archlinux.org

epiphany: error while loading shared libraries
by arch.hias＠eilert.tech 02 May '25

02 May '25

Hi, after last System upgrade witch includes icu (75.1-1.0 -> 76.1-1.0) epiphany is broken here. It says: epiphany: error while loading shared libraries: libicuuc.so.75: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory i hope these is not a big deal and epiphany just needed rebuild / upgrade. i wound try it my self, but i don't understand how to build an Arch Linux 32 package. let me know who I can provide more info, tests. And maybe there is a guide on how the 32 build system works? -- Viele Grüße hias

2 1

package devtool has no pkgctl
by 尤晓杰 13 Feb '25

13 Feb '25

发件人："尤晓杰" <yxj790222(a)163.com> 发送日期：2025-02-11 11:51:46 收件人：arch-ports-owner(a)lists.archlinux.org 主题：devtools has no pkgctl no pkgctl not find on arch32 after install devtool and base-devel package in 486/extra. according this: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Kernel … ild_system I hope to "pkgctl repo clone --protocol=https linux" but no pkgctl, the devtools and base-devel is installed -- 发自我的网易邮箱手机智能版

2 1

Problem with libxml2 depending on icu
by Friedrich Romstedt 13 Jul '24

13 Jul '24

Hi, Today I upgraded my archlinux32 box (`# pacman -Syu`) and ran into a few problems: 1. Compiling `netatalk-3.2.0-5` fails with a linkage error: `libxml2.so.2` requires `libicuuc.so.74`, which is not found, so there are undefined references; 2. The `afpd` service of `netatalk-3.2.0-4` stopped working. For both issues, I am attaching explanatory logs. Downgrading `icu` from `75.1-1.0` back to `74.2-2.0` resolves both errors: `netatalk-3.2.0-5` now compiles, and both `netatalk-3.2.0-4` as well as `netatalk-3.2.0-5` are working fine. The upgrade of `icu` from `74.2-2.0` to `75.1-1.0` was part of today's maintenance upgrade. I speculate that `libxml2` needs an update to reflect the upgrade of `icu`? Friedrich

2 1

dhcpcd: Buffer overflow after update from 9.4.1-1.0 to 10.0.2-1.0
by Friedrich Romstedt 29 Sep '23

29 Sep '23

Hi, `dhcpcd-9.4.1-1.0` is running fine on my Arch Linux 32 box. However, when updating to `dhcpcd-10.0.2-1.0`, I am encountering errors captured by `systemd`. `dhcpcd` exits with the error message `*** buffer overflow detected ***: terminated`. I am attaching the output of `systemctl status --state failed`. I did some googling but couldn't find a way to remedy this problem. Any ideas? Seems to me to be possibly system specific; please let me know what details to provide would be helpful. Best, Friedrich

2 1

Re: dhcpcd: Buffer overflow after update from 9.4.1-1.0 to 10.0.2-1.0
by Friedrich Romstedt 29 Sep '23

29 Sep '23

Hi Andreas, Am Do., 28. Sept. 2023 um 20:16 Uhr schrieb Andreas Baumann <mail(a)andreasbaumann.cc>: > > Yes, this is a known problem with some versions of dhcp. Easiest > is to simply use dhclient instead of dhcpd. Ok, thanks for the info. To avoid risking to lose access to the machine when trying possible future versions of dhcpcd, I am using a systemd-networkd approach now, which is working fine. I have a fully static use-case here. Have a nice day, Friedrich

1 0

Archlinux32: python & lots of dependent packages out of sync
by Markus Schaaf 07 Sep '23

07 Sep '23

Hi, in the Archlinux32 repos, a lot of packages that install Python modules need rebuilding. It would be nice, if upgrading Python and such packages could somehow be coordinated, such that a new release of the Python interpreter and these packages are only pushed after all of them have been rebuilt. I don't know how Archlinux handles this, but I never noticed such problem there. A cursory look through the logs seems to show that many of the packages I'm complaining about failed building, because a dependency wasn't built/updated first. For instance Borg failed because of python-jaraco.functools, which failed because the dependency python-setuptools is missing, which should have been pulled in by python-setuptools-scm. Here is part of the build log for python-jaraco.functools: > (2/3) installing python [######################] 100% > > > Optional dependencies for python > python-setuptools > python-pip > sqlite [installed] > mpdecimal: for decimal > xz: for lzma [installed] > tk: for tkinter > (3/3) installing python-more-itertools [----------------------] 0% > (3/3) installing python-more-itertools [######################] 100% > > > [?25h==> Checking buildtime dependencies... > ==> Installing missing dependencies... > [?25lresolving dependencies... > looking for conflicting packages... > > Packages (15) perl-error-0.17029-5.0 perl-mailtools-2.21-7.0 > perl-timedate-2.33-5.0 python-iniconfig-2.0.0-2.1 > python-packaging-23.1-1.1 python-pep517-0.1-1.3 > python-pluggy-1.0.0-2.1 python-typing_extensions-4.7.1-1.0 > git-2.40.1-1.0 python-build-0.1-1.3 python-installer-0.1-1.3 > python-jaraco.classes-3.2.3-1.1 python-pytest-7.4.0-1.0 > python-setuptools-scm-7.1.0-4.1 python-wheel-0.1-1.3 > > Total Installed Size: 49.66 M As you can see, python-setuptools-scm gets installed without its dependency python-setuptools. Could someone please have a look at this? BR

2 2

Arch for Arm64 for Tegra / jetson nano : how good is it ?
by Mario Marietto 09 May '23

09 May '23

Hello. I dont hide my interest in the installation of Arch arm64 on the Jetson nano. I would like to understand what works and what not. Can I have a more modern OS than Ubuntu 18.04 ? help me to understand. Very thanks. -- Mario.

1 0

Kernel panic with archlinux32 on Intel Core Solo
by Georg 09 Feb '23

09 Feb '23

Hi, attempting to convert an old Laptop* to a usable (aka Arch-based) device I run into a kernel panic when booting the latest AL32. The messages dumped on screen seem pretty unhelpful, and I wanted to make sure this is not due the dated hardware which is not supported anymore? If so, I'd appreciate a hint on where to find a (preferably arch-based) distro for that device. Thanks. Georg * Sony Vaio VGN G11XN with an Intel Core Solo U1500

2 2

repod: A new Arch Linux project for repo management
by Brett Cornwall 22 Jun '22

22 Jun '22

I'm pleased to announce a new Arch Linux project named “repod”. This project [1] contains tooling to maintain binary package repositories for Linux distributions using the Pacman package manager. Repod aims to reduce the current complexity/pain-points of Arch repository management while supporting robust/convenient management tooling. Repod is still in pre-release state and as such has not yet reached its minimum feature set. However, we'd love your involvement; We hope to benefit all distributions using Pacman, not only Arch Linux. Existing documentation and functionality may be viewed at readthedocs [2]. A number of tickets feature tags of "good first issue" [3] to ease the nascent contributor into the project. If you're interested, Join the arch-projects(a)lists.archlinux.org list [4] for announcements, meeting minutes, and development discussion. Or stop by #archlinux-projects on Libera IRC. We'd love to see you there! [1] https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/repod [2] https://repod.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ [3] https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/repod/-/issues/?label_name%5B%5D=goo… [4] https://lists.archlinux.org/mailman3/lists/arch-projects@lists.archlinux.or…

1 0

[arch-ports] An issue with qemu7 and dependencies.
by Matthew Dyer 20 May '22

20 May '22

Hi all, I am a new member to this list as I am using a pi400 using a distro designed for the blind called stormux which is based on arch arm platform. Earlyer this week qemu7 was released in the stable repo and when trying to upgrade I was told that the package qemu desktop could not be installed because of broken dependencies. I had to add both qemu-headless and qemu-img to my ingore list in pacman.conf to get the other packages to upgrade. I am wondering if there is a way to force or in this case get this package to upgrade? I know that qemu-headless was replaced with qemu-desktop, but when trying to install I can not because of this broken dependency issue. Anyone else had this problem? Thanks in advance. I am new to arm so if there is something different in this is handeled then I appolegize up frount. Thanks. Matthew

2 1