This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "Official repo DB scripts".
The branch, master has been updated
via 971181bf94d5e86bd7fce41303b51d1b3befc85b (commit)
via a75e4ee5b440a9d571658cd326f29a625320d777 (commit)
via e712811bcacd43ee443b98ad8a03347ce3a63b69 (commit)
from 0b630e25a3181d5228cbd99c9041a04b6514fc81 (commit)
Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have
not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those
revisions in full, below.
- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
commit 971181bf94d5e86bd7fce41303b51d1b3befc85b
Author: Luke Shumaker
Date: Fri Jul 13 11:23:42 2018 -0400
test: checkPackageDB(): Resolve "FIXME: We guess the location of the PKGBUILD"
The problem statement:
checkPackageDB and checkRemovedPackageDB need bit of information on the
package they're checking: a full list of pkgnames with that pkgbase, the
list of pkgarches, and (for checkPackageDB only) the full version. In
dbscripts itself, we can get that directly from the .db files; however,
since the test suite is checking the ability of dbscripts to edit those
.db files, that's obviously not a good solution.
The current solution is to get this information from the PKGBUILD...
which we also count on dbscripts to correctly keep track of. Wait,
that's skipping ahead, let's back up.
The current solution is to get this information from the PKGBUILD. For
checkRemovedPackageDB, that's easy; we just get it from trunk, as that's
the most up-to-date information on the package as-it-would-have-existed
(if that sounded a little hand-wavey, it was). But for checkPackageDB,
it's a little trickier, because of 2 factors working together: (1) there
might be different versions on different repos, and (2) unlike
checkRemovedPackageDB, checkPackageDB actually cares about pkgver. So,
checkPackageDB "guesses" the location in a slightly sloppy way, and is
tagged with a "FIXME".
What todo about it?
There are a couple of things to observe:
- Hidden in the hand-waving in assuming that "trunk" is fine for
checkRemovedPackageDB is the assumption that neither pkgname=() nor
arch=() is going to change between versions. Which is a fine
assumption, because we don't change those things between versions in
any of our test cases.
- We're counting on dbscripts correctly keeping track of which PKGBUILD
is correct for which repo... which is one of the thing's we're trying
to test, we shouldn't be counting on it. That's actually a bigger
problem than the original "FIXME"!
So, putting those things together, let's (1) take the code under test out
of the equation, and (2) remove any suggestion that the version of the
PKGBUILD makes a difference to pkgnames/pkgarches: Let's have both
functions that that information from the PKGBUILDs under "fixtures/",
rather than getting PKGBUILDs from VCS.
That just leaves one question: How to get the correct pkgver in
checkPackageDB? The obvious answer is: Each test case knows what the
version should be; add it as an argument, and adjust every testcase that
calls it.
commit a75e4ee5b440a9d571658cd326f29a625320d777
Author: Luke Shumaker
Date: Fri Jul 13 18:04:29 2018 -0400
test: Don't use "! cmd" except as the last statement in a function
With BATS setting up error traps, we get used to writing simple `[[ foo ]]`
assertions and not having to check the result. However, using `!` to
invert the result DOESN'T trigger the trap. It works OK when it is the
last command in a function, as it still affects the function's return
value, so then the trap triggers in the caller (rather than in the
function). This means that a check may run successfully when it should
fail.
So, replace all uses of bare `! cmd` with `if cmd; then return 1; fi`,
unless it is the final statement in a function (as it is in
sourceballs.bats:__checkRemovedSourcePackage())
The mistake meant that checkRemovedPackage() was effectively equivalent to
checkRemovedPackageDB(). This meant that no one noticed that db-updates's
"add package with inconsistent name fails" test called checkRemovedPackage
instead of checkRemovedPackageDB. Fixing the ! issue means that the test
now fails, so change which function it calls.
commit e712811bcacd43ee443b98ad8a03347ce3a63b69
Author: Luke Shumaker
Date: Thu Jun 21 22:01:54 2018 -0400
test: db-move: Verify that it works on single-arch packages
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary of changes:
test/cases/db-move.bats | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
test/cases/db-repo-add.bats | 6 +++---
test/cases/db-update.bats | 24 ++++++++++++------------
test/cases/ftpdir-cleanup.bats | 14 +++++++++-----
test/cases/testing2x.bats | 2 +-
test/lib/common.bash | 30 ++++++++++--------------------
6 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
hooks/post-receive
--
Official repo DB scripts