On 05/02/2011 11:23 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
N0: device-mapper/LVM udev rules must be parsed for initramfs creation to add OPTIONS+="db_persist" Patch looks good now. Great! I am unsure and confused why we would need this db_persist option. In
Am 02.05.2011 16:00, schrieb Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi: the past, we killed udev and the db completely and everything worked out fine. What kind of state would need to be persistent? Is upstream adding this option? Yes, that is what I not understand, If I am not wrong this was before devtmpfs times.
Maybe this is needed in case if rules on initramfs differs from real root. Dave can you ask to Kay on IRC about this? (I am going to my work now) Thanks. -- Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi \cos^2\alpha + \sin^2\alpha = 1