On Wed, 5 Aug 2009 16:23:21 -0500 Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Dieter Plaetinck<dieter@plaetinck.be> wrote:
Well afaik we try to keep a decent, officially maintained page, something we're sure nobody can mess with and something we can keep up to date. So leaving importent content "in the wild" isn't much of an option. someone correct me if i'm wrong please :)
It's an odd topic... but mostly I agree. Supplementary docs that are "in the wild" are fine, but if we're talking "official documentation" then it needs some sort of gatekeeper who says what is good and what is not
remarkably, translations of the official guides are/will be accepted like they are but we can't really check them, unless me/Aaron/Gerhard/<insert new volunteers here> knows the language.