Account Suspended, No Reason Given
I recently tried to be the maintainer for an package that hasn't been updated in quite some time. I've been using my own PKGBUILD for the particular package with great success, and currently am maintaining the "lib32-sdl2-hg" 32 bit version of this package. Upon request of this package, It was denied for no reason given, except a disrespectful message from coderob and I quote. "come back with a better request, my dude" So I did, I requested to maintain the package again, and was denied, then my account got suspended. Whats the deal here? I wasn't warned about anything I may have done wrong, and I'm currently maintaining two packages, and co-maintaining another one, which I no longer can access. Please unsuspend my account so I can maintain my packages. Vincent Grande <shoober420>
That sucks, maintainers should be welcomed.. I only hope said maintainers arent injecting malicious code into the compiled packages. Lagnus On 3 Nov 2018 18:58, "shoober420" <shoober420@gmail.com> wrote: I recently tried to be the maintainer for an package that hasn't been updated in quite some time. I've been using my own PKGBUILD for the particular package with great success, and currently am maintaining the "lib32-sdl2-hg" 32 bit version of this package. Upon request of this package, It was denied for no reason given, except a disrespectful message from coderob and I quote. "come back with a better request, my dude" So I did, I requested to maintain the package again, and was denied, then my account got suspended. Whats the deal here? I wasn't warned about anything I may have done wrong, and I'm currently maintaining two packages, and co-maintaining another one, which I no longer can access. Please unsuspend my account so I can maintain my packages. Vincent Grande <shoober420>
On 11/3/18 9:29 PM, Edward Halls wrote:
That sucks, maintainers should be welcomed.. I only hope said maintainers arent injecting malicious code into the compiled packages.
Lagnus
This thread was erroneously cross-posted to the aurweb development list, despite having nothing to do with the codebase behind the aur.archlinux.org website. Indeed, it has nothing to do with any aspect of the development process of the AUR. ... Please direct all further responses to the aur-general mailing list, especially the reply which has already been given at https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2018-November/034492.html Thanks. -- Eli Schwartz Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
participants (3)
-
Edward Halls
-
Eli Schwartz
-
shoober420