On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 02:25 +0300, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 07/16/2010 02:15 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 00:12 +0200, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
I would be very delighted to see bin32-wine moving into community. If you can package all the lib32 packages it depends on you will a) be able to do that b) have some packages that make good community candidates anyway (lib32 stuff). Also, why can't you do it while on vacation? Surely you have your SSH tunnel, right? :)
-- Lord Sven-Hendrik "Svenstaro" Haase
I second the bin32-wine thing =). For it to be useful though I think lib32-all-graphic-drivers need to be available?
no. only lib32-libgl and lib32-nvidia-utils, which already are in community.
lets stick in the future in $subject and start another thread if you feel you need to add something about packaging :D
Your wish is my command. Okay now that I have your answer I understand my assumptions were mistaken, only the libgl/nvidia-utils packages are 'app-facing' in that sense. A nagging question that I've been having in the back of my mind, how similar is Arch's lib32 stuff with the multi-lib stuff other distros (random example Ubuntu since that's my previous experience) do. When I first started using Arch I set a chroot up for my wine/skype/google-earth on the understanding that lib32 would always be 'unofficial', but recently I've seen more lib32 packages making it to [community]. Would lib32 make Arch multi-lib, then?