Am 16.09.2010 16:30, schrieb Lukas Fleischer:
Hi,
Just wrote a small script to check for duplicate package names in the AUR and the official repos and created a list of duplicates. For each of the packages I quickly checked AUR and [extra]/[community] package versions, AUR comments and whether there seem to be some additional patches in the AUR version. It might be better to double check tho...
The following packages already are in [extra] and AUR versions seem to be equivalent or outdated:
- gcin: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39653 - gthumb: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27129 - libwpg: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25652 - perl-class-factory-util: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25955 - perl-class-inspector: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10540 - perl-datetime-format-builder: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25956 - perl-datetime-format-strptime: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9334 - perl-image-size: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=3286 - perl-time-hires: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35514 - perl-xml-parser: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40119 - v4l-utils: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38218 - xpyb: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19975
Following packages already are in [community] and AUR versions seem to be equivalent or outdated:
- cadaver: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=8635 - cksfv: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=8688 - evas-svn: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19315 - gpsbabel: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37028 - kim4: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38648 - ktoblzcheck: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9104 - lwp: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=8703 - perl-parse-recdescent: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36080 - pulseaudio-mixer-applet: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24016 - qoauth: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28485 - remmina: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38933 - springlobby: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39670 - urbanterror-data: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21493 - winegame: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37828 - winestuff: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37829 - wmctrl: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=1294 - lib32-alsa-oss: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12815 - lib32-ati-dri: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29742 - lib32-intel-dri: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24770 - lib32-libmng: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20890 - lib32-libstdc++5: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11191
Quite a few packages that are already in the official repos are maintained by the Arch Haskell team in the AUR. I'm not sure what to do with them. These packages include:
- darcs: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39679 - happy: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26280 - gtk2hs-buildtools: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37478 - haskell-cgi, haskell-dataenc, haskell-deepseq, haskell-extensible-exceptions, haskell-hashed-storage, haskell-haskeline, haskell-hunit, haskell-mmap, haskell-quickcheck, haskell-regex-base, haskell-regex-compat, haskell-regex-posix, haskell-stm, haskell-terminfo
Following packages should probably stay in the AUR although they're duplicates, check AUR comments:
- awesome: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13038 - q4wine: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36728 - sk1: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16559 - sk1libs: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35066
gadmin-samba (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40599) seems to be newer than the package in [community] but the project homepage says the [community] package is still up-to-date. Maybe the AUR version is an unstable release?
sleuthkit (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2012) and the sleuthkit package in [community] seem to have some differences in the PKGBUILD. Not sure what to do, check AUR comments.
So far... Hope that helps :)
Regards, Lukas
Hello, thank you for your very long list. Can you provide your script somewhere, maybe in AUR? I removed all of the mentioned PKGBUILDS. Regardless if they are written differently or are even better than the ones in the repos: The AUR is not the place for packages equally named with packages in the repos. Regards Stefan