On 21/11/10 21:24, Peter Lewis wrote:
On Sunday 21 November 2010 00:34:39 Allan McRae wrote:
Shouldn't pigeonhole just have a very specific versioned dependency on dovecot (at least depends=('dovecot=$_dcpkgver'), if not adding a $_dcpkgrel there too). That would stop dovecot being upgraded without pigeonhole also being upgraded.
Yep, that's what I've done; it's in [community] now. I believe that just the pkgver should suffice, since when it breaks, it checks the version number of the running dovecot and if different from the linked-against one, bails out.
It's probably worth also mentioning that if a new version of dovecot ever ends up in [testing] (or some other unstable repo), there should probably be an accompanying build of pigeonhole... is this what [community-testing] is for?
Yes. [testing] and [community-testing] are a pair.