Re: [aur-general] voting period for Dave Reisner

17/30 does not make a 66% quorum, so yes, the motion could still fail. On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 3:07 AM, Kaiting Chen wrote:

On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Dave Reisner wrote:

...

On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 01:39:13AM +0100, PyroPeter wrote:

...

On 12/04/2010 07:29 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:

...

Hi,

the 5 days discussion period have ended.

http://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=42

42!

Yup, that's right. 42. Vote wisely, gentlemen. We may very well unfold the meaning of life here.

This is sort of what I was talking about in my previous mail about the refinement of the bylaws. Thirteen hours have passed since the beginning of the voting period and at this point according to this page:

https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Trusted_Users

There are thirty Trusted Users. Seventeen yay's have been cast and a simple majority has already been reached. We should amend the bylaws such that the voting period may end because no amount of nay's can change the outcome of the vote at this point. There is no reason for falconindy to wait another seven days to receive his Trusted User privileges. --Kaiting.

-- Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/