Am 14.10.2010 09:51, schrieb Vitaliy Berdinskikh UR6LAD:
Hi all!
Am 14.10.2010 09:27, schrieb Ng Oon-Ee:
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 09:14 +0200, Stefan Husmann wrote:
Am 14.10.2010 08:42, schrieb Ng Oon-Ee:
I just noticed that libreoffice-new has been uploaded. Contrary to the ... I propose that libreoffice[1] and libreoffice-new[2] be deleted. The author should reupload as libreoffice-bin. If a TU agrees, I volunteer to email the author. ...
... I would not recommend its usage, but let people decide. ...
I was just thinking the name is misleading, and -bin is a better name. ... Yes this is a discussable point.
Can I upload libreoffice (3.3.0-beta not 3.2.99) to AUR? Who can explain?
-- Less QRM more DX Vitaliy Berdinskikh
-- реклама ----------------------------------------------------------- Три новые линейки хостинг-планов - всё что нужно Вашему сайту! 6 месяцев хостинга бесплатно и домен в подарок. http://Hvosting.ua
Hello, not under that name. If you do not compile from sources, use libreoffice-bin. -beta was my first choice, but -bin is imho better. Regards Stefan