On 06/26/2013 10:46 AM, Rob Til Freedmen wrote:
There are 828 packages from 299 maintainers where category is set to 'none' - another 209 packages are orphaned.
orphan - Buce https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?C=1&PP=250&SB=m&SO=a&O=0
buhman - gtmanfred https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?C=1&PP=250&SB=m&SO=a&O=250
gtmanfred - Perberos https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?C=1&PP=250&SB=m&SO=a&O=500
Perberos - yhager https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?C=1&PP=250&SB=m&SO=a&O=750
yhager - zosodk69 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?C=1&PP=250&SB=m&SO=a&O=1000
full csv list of packages with category=none (no orphaned listed) http://sprunge.us/Necd
This top-20 list counting for nearly 50% of the packages 8 masterkorp 9 Huulivoide 9 zootboy 10 spider-mario 11 buhman 11 kevku 11 nbryskin 12 eworm 13 demonicmaniac 15 crocowhile 16 Mizuchi 16 t-8ch 18 taylorchu 21 chenxiaolong 27 Diego 32 gtmanfred 33 yhager 34 StefanHusmann 35 Perberos 43 Morfeo
full csv list maintainers with a count of packages with category=none http://sprunge.us/BDFD
I think this has no priority but should be fixed nevertheless.
Holy crap, I am actually shocked that jnbek doesn't appear on that sprunge at least once... out of almost 800 pkgs, I fig'd there would be at least 1 without a category, I know there were like 3 that didn't have a description and I think I got those fixed... but all mine with categories, that blows my mind, lol... -- John D Jones III Perl/Javascript/Systemd Zealot unixgeek1972@gmail.com http://www.zoelife4u.org/