On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Thomas Dziedzic <gostrc@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Seblu <seblu@seblu.net> wrote:
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Peter Lewis <plewis@aur.archlinux.org> wrote:
On Sunday 23 January 2011 16:15:41 Peter Lewis wrote:
On Sunday 16 January 2011 21:07:28 Peter Lewis wrote:
On Sunday 16 January 2011 20:37:13 Seblu wrote:
Tonight I decided to propose me as TU. My sponsor is Peter Lewis.
I am indeed. Let the discussion period begin!
The discussion period has now ended and voting can begin. Please pop along to the AUR to do so:
Voting is now closed and the results are in:
Yes - 7 No - 11 Abstain - 5
Quoracy was reached (74%) with a total of 23 / 31 active+voting TUs casting their votes.
Sorry Sébastien, on this occasion I'm afraid you were unsuccessful.
According to the bylaws, you're welcome to apply again after a minimum period of three months.
I wonder if it might be useful at this stage for some of the TUs to give Sébastien some advice on improving his application in case he decides to reapply in the future.
Thanks for your support Peter and thoses we vote for me.
Hey Seblu, I would just like to thank you for your application, even if it didn't go the way you had hoped for. It seems like your intentions are good, but you somewhat lacking in experience. That said, I would welcome you to apply again once you started getting more involved with the community. One suggestion is to become really good with packages and maintain a lot more of them, but other skills would also be nice, fix bugs etc.
Cheers!
I just saw this Sebula, I hope that you consider re-applying once you have a few more packages under your belt, you are very close to becoming a TU and we would love to have you! -Thomas S Hatch