Re: How is this package even in AUR?

Le 17/09/2023 à 11:02, Tomaz Canabrava a écrit :

We have a few packages that are vim plugins, I don’t understand why this would fail to be ok and other plugins, good.

The idea of a package is not to help users update and keep up with new versions?

This package has multiple issues that makes it not compliant with the AUR rules and guidelines: 1 - The AUR is meant for Arch Linux only. Packages that specifically targets any other OS (including Arch derivatives) or other environment (in this case "Termux") are not allowed on the AUR. 2 - Arch Linux only officially supports the x86_64 architecture. AUR packages can optionally supports __additional__ architectures but shouldn't be restricted to them. This package is currently only supporting the aarch64 architecture which is not allowed. 3 - Despite packaging a prebuilt binary, it is not using the required "-bin" suffix. Regarding the above, this package can (and should) be removed from the AUR.

On Sun, 17 Sep 2023 at 10:22 GoldenKnightFly mailto:afiqquraisyzulkarnain@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello, how is the `bun-termux` package even in AUR? It's literally a package for Termux, not for Arch Linux. Take a look at the PKGBUILD:

mv"${srcdir}/bun-linux-aarch64/bun""${PREFIX}/bin/bun"

It's literally pointing to Termux prefix which is `/data/data/com.termux/files/usr`.

-- Regards, Robin Candau / Antiz