For the gnome3.6 ibus-integration problem Felix Yan mentioned above, the patch to split ibus into ibus and libibus is already tested and can be found here[1]. [1] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/32071 On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Yichao Yu <yyc1992@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Yichao Yu <yyc1992@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Allen Li <cyberdupo56@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 17:45:51 +0200 Alexander Rødseth <rodseth@gmail.com> wrote:
If I understand it correctly, we _could_ drop ibus and just use fcitx instead, but supporting ibus as well is preferrable, since many people also use ibus.
My gripe with fcitx is that it is poorly documented (in English at least), and I wasn't able to get it to work. I'm sure people are using it fine, but I feel that the quality of software is limited by its documentation. No documentation = software sucks, end of story. If we move in this direction, I'd like to see someone familiar with fcitx update the wiki accordingly =).
We have just updated the English wiki of fcitx recently. It still lack some detail description of certain engines (e.g. pinyin) but simply install the packages and set environment variables according to the arch wiki should make it works just fine. Would you mind describing your problem (maybe on fcitx@googlegroups.com) so that we can help with it and probably add it to wiki?
We are also aware of our poor documentation and is trying to improve that both on our own wiki[1] and on the user interface.
missing link
[1] fcitx-im.org/wiki/Fcitx
.... sorry
THX for the suggestion.
Allen Li