18 Oct
2012
18 Oct
'12
10:47 p.m.
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 17:45:51 +0200 Alexander Rødseth <rodseth@gmail.com> wrote:
If I understand it correctly, we _could_ drop ibus and just use fcitx instead, but supporting ibus as well is preferrable, since many people also use ibus.
My gripe with fcitx is that it is poorly documented (in English at least), and I wasn't able to get it to work. I'm sure people are using it fine, but I feel that the quality of software is limited by its documentation. No documentation = software sucks, end of story. If we move in this direction, I'd like to see someone familiar with fcitx update the wiki accordingly =). Allen Li