There's no positive or negative reply to it, because there's still questions left unanswered. 1. Coderobe's comment on use of sed in iup went disregarded. [1] (It appears the https source was addressed, and Daurnimator commented on the static linking.) 2. We don't know why luarocks would be a "runtime dependency" or why this would be problematic in the first place. [2] 3. We don't know why the argument on using pkg-config in LUA should be dismissed. [3] Considering the questions are relevant regarding the use of bare gcc lines (!) in PKGBUILDs a candidate may want to add to [community], I'd say it's especially important to answer them. (From a more personal perspective, I'm interested in generally competent Lua package maintainers, as I consider to use the language in some of my projects.) Now it's almost too late with the voting period already started... Alad [1] https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2018-December/034694.html [2] https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2018-December/034702.html [3] https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2018-December/034708.html