Re: [aur-general] Please delete a lot of packages

On 10 September 2010 13:09, Evangelos Foutras wrote:

On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Det wrote:

...

On 9/9/10, Evangelos Foutras wrote:

...

On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Evangelos Foutras wrote:

...

Deleted xorg-server-gentoo; will go through the songbird mess now.

I've only deleted songbird-nightly-latest, the rest seem fine to keep (i.e.: they have maintainers, were updated within a year and have enough votes).

Ok, thank you but 'songbird' and 'songbird-svn' are the same package so the other one should be removed - with the addition that 'songbird-svn's PKGBUILD works better.

'songbird-nightly' and 'songbird-nightly-bin' are also the same package - with the addition that 'songbird-auto-nightly' is always up to date as it automatically checks for the latest nightly version.

Sure, they do have a lot of votes but that's just because they've been around for so long, while 'songbird-auto-nightly' was created less than a month ago.

       Det

Sorry, I'm having a hard time deciding what goes and what stays.

If another TU wants to jump in and handle this request, please do.

Wow, what a mess. For now I would certainly leave the songbird-svn. It has correct name and it seems to be quite good PKGBUILD. I'd prefer if the songbird-auto-nightly was renamed to the songbird-nightly-bin and then removed. I think songbird should be removed, because it's in fact the same as songbird-svn. I don't see any reason to keep it because it seems that they do not release any source tarballs. However it has just too much votes to remove it. Lukas