On 06/30/2014 12:40 PM, Johannes Löthberg wrote:
On 30/06, Mike Hobbs wrote:
Yeah, but AFAIK that's necessary, though, in order to replace xorg-server with a patched version. At least that's the convention that seen elsewhere with other AUR packages that contain bug fixes.
No, the pkgbase should be something else and your package should conflict/replace the repo one.
Maybe I misunderstood then. I assumed that everything else that depends on xorg-server being present would then break. I'll give it a try...
Thanks, - Mike