Re: [aur-general] Deletion request for rasqal in [AUR]

hollunder@gmx.at schrieb:

An upstream change required rasqal to be moved to [extra] so redland can provide the same functionality. I don't see a point in keeping the [AUR] version. The maintainer wasn't particularly responsive either.

http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4148

Thanks to AndyRTR for resolving the issue swiftly. Regards, Philipp

Thank you, deleted.