18 Mar
2015
18 Mar
'15
9:27 a.m.
On Wed, 2015-03-18 at 09:15 +0100, Stefan Husmann wrote:
IMHO in this case neither arch-general nor aur-general are appropiate, but the comments page in AUR for the requested package is.
I also prefer to add a comment, but IMO aur-general is appropiate too. "This list is for [snip] the general public to discuss issues surrounding [snip] the Arch User Repository (AUR)." It doesn't exclude requests about issues, caused by software build from AUR. 2 Cents, Ralf