On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 12:44:19PM -0300, Angel Velásquez wrote:
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Florian Friesdorf <flo@chaoflow.net> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 12:31:37PM -0300, Angel Velásquez wrote:
Thomas Bächler wrote: Im in favour of this, my unique concern is about how hard will be creating another level of permission in the AUR, and some rules about, if a semi-tu can orphan packages from TUs or TU-Dev, figuring out that
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Chris Brannon <cmbrannon79@gmail.com> wrote: part, and assuming that will have an approbation, we will start writting patches, so this can be a "slow" process, (2 months or so if it's aproved? plus the time of discussion?).
I'd give an AUR moderator all permissions to mess around in the AUR, be it packages of TUs or not. If somebody messes up, he/she can be punished later.
Lol no punishment! I don't wanna hit anybody!;
;) still - I don't see the advantages of too restrictive rules. Let's start answering the questions - her my suggestions:
Well, other question how will be the process of selection of these semi-tu?
- (self-)proposal on this list with short personal description. - 10 people in favour: et voila - one opposing: AUR-TUs vote about it - less than ten AUR-TUs: TU's vote along the AUR-TUs
how will be called the group semi-tu ? trusted but not at all?
AUR-TUs - trusted user of the AUR
there are many many questions until we can make this idea possible. Just that.
Let's get going :) -- Florian Friesdorf <flo@chaoflow.net> GPG FPR: EA5C F2B4 FBBB BA65 3DCD E8ED 82A1 6522 4A1F 4367 Jabber/XMPP: flo@chaoflow.net OTR FPR: 9E191746 213321FE C896B37D 24B118C0 31785700 IRC: chaoflow on freenode,ircnet,blafasel,OFTC