On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 12:44:19PM -0300, Angel Velásquez wrote:
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Florian Friesdorf
wrote: On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 12:31:37PM -0300, Angel Velásquez wrote:
Thomas Bächler wrote: Im in favour of this, my unique concern is about how hard will be creating another level of permission in the AUR, and some rules about, if a semi-tu can orphan packages from TUs or TU-Dev, figuring out that
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Chris Brannon
wrote: part, and assuming that will have an approbation, we will start writting patches, so this can be a "slow" process, (2 months or so if it's aproved? plus the time of discussion?). I'd give an AUR moderator all permissions to mess around in the AUR, be it packages of TUs or not. If somebody messes up, he/she can be punished later.
Lol no punishment! I don't wanna hit anybody!;
;) still - I don't see the advantages of too restrictive rules. Let's start answering the questions - her my suggestions:
Well, other question how will be the process of selection of these semi-tu?
- (self-)proposal on this list with short personal description. - 10 people in favour: et voila - one opposing: AUR-TUs vote about it - less than ten AUR-TUs: TU's vote along the AUR-TUs
how will be called the group semi-tu ? trusted but not at all?
AUR-TUs - trusted user of the AUR
there are many many questions until we can make this idea possible. Just that.
Let's get going :)
--
Florian Friesdorf