Sending again as Gmail SPF policy denied my previous message
-------- Forwarded Message --------
tallero [1] added the following comment to libisl25-static [2]:
If Marcello Meszaros were a good maintainer he wouldn't need me to tell him each time for what packages my static depends are written for and he would go check himself.
Actually he's capable of going check and lie, as with Banshee.
As usual, I urge people to either make him stop making me lose so much time after his useless deletion requests.
Many packages can't currently bu upgraded becausu Muflone disabled my mobile account.
The attacks I've received from these two individuals are shameful to say the least and I'm starting to think they should be asked to go away.
[1]https://aur.archlinux.org/account/tallero/ [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/libisl25-static/
@tallero / @trucolo / Pellegrino Prevete your first account was suspended for disrespecting the AUR rules and decisions.
Before suspending your trucolo account I asked you to read the Arch Linux code of conduct but unfortunately it seems you have not any intention to respect any rules.
Therefore I'm going to delete this your latest comment and give you
Regards
I can't see how suspending my mobile account can help me maintain my
Il 17/03/24 19:10, Pellegrino Prevete ha scritto: the final warning before banning you definitively from the AUR, in all of your accounts. packages and do my work and [...]
Dear Muflone, because of that suspension I can't send code signed with my larger set of keys to the aur without adding those same keys to my main account, which I won't do. How after finally getting in touch directly on the mailing list to address your statement about an implied difference between a flash game and a nes rom should make you think disabling my account is gonna be more effective than addressing that statement and not creating issues for everybody is currently a mystery to me. At this point I am gonna wonder if the reason you disabled my mobile account is you have thought I can lose time managing sockpuppets and not simply following best practices. About my aur comments I do not see anything wrong with them, my packages are routinely sent for deletion instead of having their dependencies fixed and packages are deleted in such a way to slowly get down whole stacks seemingly on purpose. I do not receive any replies about these observations anywhere, I am instead reprehended on here for having reported in the comments the kind of pressures I receive. I hope we can talk in good terms from now on. Pellegrino