Re: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining?

2010/2/3 Angel Velásquez :

On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Chris Brannon wrote:

...

Thomas Bächler wrote:

...

I think it is a good idea. We could create the "AUR moderator" position instead of calling it "Semi-TU".

This is a fine idea, and I see no harm in it.

Im in favour of this, my unique concern is about how hard will be creating another level of permission in the AUR,

It's not so long so obviously ...

and some rules about, if a semi-tu can orphan packages from TUs or TU-Dev, figuring out that part, and assuming that will have an approbation, we will start writting patches, so this can be a "slow" process, (2 months or so if it's aproved? plus the time of discussion?).

Uhm.. what.. really ? 2 monthes for you ? Best Regards, Laszlo Papp