Thank you very much for your help :) I really think AUR should not be like a torrent site. Im not a moralist, and I have used abandonware myself. XD But I really think aur is not the place for that, and of course, is not the place for "office ultrawarez full editon 2011" (lol) but it can be the place for a demo edition. thank you Ray rashif for helping to clarify this, and thank you to everyone :D --- El vie 28-oct-11, Ray Rashif <schiv@archlinux.org> escribió:
* Uploading a "Microsoft Office 2011 Demo" PKGBUID
De: Ray Rashif <schiv@archlinux.org> Asunto: Re: [aur-general] Request to add a rule A: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" <aur-general@archlinux.org> Fecha: viernes, 28 de octubre de 2011, 17:29 On 29 October 2011 06:14, Ray Rashif <schiv@archlinux.org> wrote: that retrieves an
official *non-redistributable* archive containing clean executables is WRONG.
Ammendment to this part:
* Uploading a "Microsoft Office 2011 Demo" PKGBUILD that retrieves *from a third-party site* an official *non-redistributable* archive containing clean executables is WRONG.
* Uploading a "Microsoft Office 2011 Demo" PKGBUILD that retrieves *from the official site* an official *non-redistributable* archive containing clean executables is RIGHT, *unless linking from third-party sites is explicitly forbidden*.
-- GPG/PGP ID: 8AADBB10