Thank you very much for your help :)
I really think AUR should not be like a torrent site.
Im not a moralist, and I have used abandonware myself. XD
But I really think aur is not the place for that, and of course, is not the place for "office ultrawarez full editon 2011" (lol) but it can be the place for a demo edition.
thank you Ray rashif for helping to clarify this, and thank you to everyone
:D
--- El vie 28-oct-11, Ray Rashif
* Uploading a "Microsoft Office 2011 Demo" PKGBUID
De: Ray Rashif
Asunto: Re: [aur-general] Request to add a rule A: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" Fecha: viernes, 28 de octubre de 2011, 17:29 On 29 October 2011 06:14, Ray Rashif wrote: that retrieves an official *non-redistributable* archive containing clean executables is WRONG.
Ammendment to this part:
* Uploading a "Microsoft Office 2011 Demo" PKGBUILD that retrieves *from a third-party site* an official *non-redistributable* archive containing clean executables is WRONG.
* Uploading a "Microsoft Office 2011 Demo" PKGBUILD that retrieves *from the official site* an official *non-redistributable* archive containing clean executables is RIGHT, *unless linking from third-party sites is explicitly forbidden*.
-- GPG/PGP ID: 8AADBB10