On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Ray Rashif <schiv@archlinux.org> wrote:
On 17 June 2011 10:34, Thomas Dziedzic <gostrc@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Martti Kühne <mysatyre@gmail.com> wrote:
please delete pidgin-gtalkinvisible [1], I'm the maintainer and announced deprecation in favor of pidgin-gtalk-shared-status [2] a month ago.
cheers! mar77i
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30136 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48997
terminated
Hey Martti and everyone
We see that Ng had uploaded the same thing before: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38551 And this is Martti's new upload: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48997
1. pidgin-gtalksharedstatus 2. pidgin-gtalk-shared-status
Usually the new one would not be honoured, but Ng, do you think you would want to rename your package? I think a better name is following the $client-$protocol-$addon format which neither does, i.e 'pidgin-gtalk-sharedstatus'.
Otherwise, if the name is not important, we'll have to remove Martti's version of the package.
Actually, after some consideration his naming is more appropriate, since that's the name of the source tarball is gtalk-shared-status. I would like my package renamed to that name, though I would not object to deleting my package and leaving his one, as long as he can maintain it.