5 Jan
2009
5 Jan
'09
9:57 p.m.
On 1/5/09, Loui Chang <louipc.ist@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 06:06:03PM +0100, Mathias Burén wrote:
Agreed, but two months? Isn't that a bit too long? One month is good enough in my opinion.
A month would be alright. I'd prefer two weeks though. Hah! I'd like to avoid using a cron job to do this. Any ideas or patches for such an implementation are welcome at aur-dev@archlinux.org
Cheers!
You know a typical holiday takes longer than two weeks (well, mine at least). So I'm against anything shorter than 1 month, which IMO is maybe already a bit short. There may also be instances that packages are wrongly flagged out of date, or packages can't be updated for some reasons. How do you want to implement these? Ronald