On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 at 10:25 Jonathan Steel <jsteel@archlinux.org> wrote:
On Sun 16 Jul 2023 at 15:37, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
I have experience with packaging (debian, for work) but not on arch, but it’s shell and that thing I can handle :)
Why not show this by maintaining some air packages?
Mostly because there is nothing in aur that I use that lacks a maintainer. But I do have a software that is not packaged yet that I can port to aur.
This is not gpg signed and I’m sorry for that, but gian and Antonio can also vouch for me as the validity of this email.
Why is it not signed?
Because I don’t have a gpg key, and when the dkim features on the email already are enough to validate that the email I send is from me.
I think you should read https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Trusted_Users and re-submit a signed application showing the minimum requirements are met.
I have read the wiki and I have applied to a packager position following the wiki rules or explaining why I didn’t follow a part of it, i won’t re-apply because that’s a waste of everyone’s time just for the sake of ticking boxes. Summary: - [x] known on the opensource community with multiple, and used, programs - [x] packaging experience - [ ] aur / arch package experience - [x] contributes directly to upstream - [ ] signed the mail with gpg Best, Tomaz
-- Jonathan Steel