Excerpts from Ng Oon-Ee's message of 2010-08-23 16:06:54 +0200:
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 14:03 +0200, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
Excerpts from Ty John (sand_man)'s message of 2010-08-23 13:53:51 +0200:
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 19:30 +0800, Ray Rashif wrote:
On 23 August 2010 19:25, Ty John (sand_man) <ty-ml@eye-of-odin.com> wrote:
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 12:24 +0200, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
Excerpts from Ty John (sand_man)'s message of 2010-08-23 12:13:11 +0200: > I noticed this package is currently unmaintained. > Can I adopt this?
Please do so, if you think it's still needed. I orphaned it because I lost interest in the program, but afaik in the meantime there's hardly a difference between this package and the one in [extra].
I can't believe I didn't see the 'adopt' button.
Yeah I wasn't sure if it's the same or not. Does the one in extra support lv2 plugins? It doesn't seem to be specifically compiled in the same way. I'll keep it updated for now.
Yes, extra/ardour is compiled with LV2 support. The only difference between the two different binaries would be whatever change is influenced by having FFT_ANALYSIS.
-- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD
I see. FFT is an audio visualisation tool. I guess this package probably shouldn't really be called -lv2 then.
When I created it, the [extra] package wasn't built with lv2 support (slv2 wasn't in [extra] either). It appeared sensible at the time, because lv2 support was the major difference.
\me goes to uninstall ardour-lv2 and update from extra =).
Thanks, you're right, the lv2 support was the big difference. I recommend ardour-lv2 can be removed, since its not required anymore with [extra] having lv2 support.
Yeah, I did the same. The difference is small now and -lv2 is a misnomer now, so I'd also be in favor of removal. The [extra] PKGBUILD is good now and easy to modify anyway. -- Philipp -- "Wir stehen selbst enttäuscht und sehn betroffen / Den Vorhang zu und alle Fragen offen." Bertolt Brecht, Der gute Mensch von Sezuan