Re: [aur-general] python renaming

On 06/19/2011 11:11 AM, Axilleas P wrote:

I don't know if the renaming patch was applied to AUR and if it's possible to just rename the packages or they have to be deleted and be uploaded again though. Let a TU tell us.

On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Hector Martinez-Seara wrote:

...

Yes, I completely agree. Python Packages are right now a mess. Hector

On 19 June 2011 09:08, Axilleas P wrote:

...

Just yesterday I adopted python-jinja2 [1]. There are also two other similar packages. One is python-jinja1 [2] and python3-jinja2 [3], relying on python2 and python3 respectively. So, my question is, shouldn't packages depended on python2 be renamed accordingly? In this case [1][2] to python2-jinja1/2 and [3] to just python-jinja2?

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41497 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26870 [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38651

-- (\_ /) copy the bunny to your profile (0.o ) to help him achieve world domination. (> <) come join the dark side. /_|_\ (we have cookies.)

-- Hector Martínez-Seara Monné mail: hseara@gmail.com Tel: +34656271145 Tel: +358442709253

We Can't rename packages -- Jelle van der Waa