16 May
2011
16 May
'11
3:32 p.m.
2011/5/16 Lukáš Jirkovský <l.jirkovsky@gmail.com>:
I removed [4] as I see you already take over the [1].
For some time now I'm the maintainer of pcsx2, pcsx2-svn-bin and pcsx2-svn. My intention is to have in AUR only a binary as source (pcsx2 or pcsx2-bin) and another with SVN as source.
However I'm not sure whether pcsx2-bin should be removed, the maintainer seems to be active.
Yeah, sort of. At least he didn't reply my email for around 10 days. I hope he reply yours, but case he doesn't, I'm in for adopting.
If there is no source package I personally prefer the pcsx2 name (without the -bin suffix).
Agree with you.
I CCed this email to matthewbauer, so he could share his opinion on this topic.
Lukas
Cheers, -- Rafael