On 12 September 2010 00:39, Philipp Überbacher <hollunder@lavabit.com> wrote:
Excerpts from Det's message of 2010-09-11 19:36:05 +0200:
On 9/10/10, Lukáš Jirkovský <l.jirkovsky@gmail.com> wrote:
On 10 September 2010 13:09, Evangelos Foutras <foutrelis@gmail.com> wrote:
Sorry, I'm having a hard time deciding what goes and what stays.
If another TU wants to jump in and handle this request, please do.
Wow, what a mess.
For now I would certainly leave the songbird-svn. It has correct name and it seems to be quite good PKGBUILD.
I'd prefer if the songbird-auto-nightly was renamed to the songbird-nightly-bin and then removed.
I think songbird should be removed, because it's in fact the same as songbird-svn. I don't see any reason to keep it because it seems that they do not release any source tarballs. However it has just too much votes to remove it.
Lukas
Jesus, well the nicest thing to do then would be to first replace "songbird-nightly" with "songbird-auto-nightly" and _then_ delete: "songbird", "songbird-auto-nightly" and "songbird-nightly-bin".
"Songbird" does indeed have a lot of votes, which is just too bad, but if "the binary version of Songbird" has to be "songbird-bin", then "the SVN version of Songbird" has to also be "songbird-svn"... unless that logic would need the developers to release a versioned source too... which they don't.
Chrissake, Det
I know little about it, but if I'm not wrong, songbird for linux isn't developed anymore? So what does it matter? -- Philipp
-- "Wir stehen selbst enttäuscht und sehn betroffen / Den Vorhang zu und alle Fragen offen." Bertolt Brecht, Der gute Mensch von Sezuan
It seems you're right. It should be replaced by Nightingale (http://getnightingale.com/), Songbird's fork.