On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:00 AM, Sven-Hendrik Haase <sh@lutzhaase.com> wrote:
On 01.12.2010 00:11, PyroPeter wrote:
On 11/30/2010 11:51 PM, Seblu wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Wanton<wanton.clarion@gmail.com> wrote:
bin32-zsnes http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19167 Already in multilib.
rocksndiamonds-fedora https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22418 Outdated, replaced by community/rocksndiamonds.
dune2 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33037 Broken link, and this is non-free game.
In a general way, non-free game/soft is a valid argument?
No. Afaik even the official repositorys contain non-free software.
Indeed, rms wouldn't be happy. Anyhow, if end up discussing the ethics of non-free software we'll end up like Debian. Let's just let our users choose what they want to use as long as providing the software isn't illegal.
Just fix the broken link or orphan the package and let somebody else take over.
-- Sven-Hendrik
Fix: as i know, its a commercial game.